• Temple EM

ProCESS Trial

The Article:

A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock. The ProCESS Investigators. New Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1683-1693.

The Idea:

Whether Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) vs Protocol Based vs “Usual Care” influences mortality in patients with severe sepsis

The Study:

1342 Randomized patients with severe sepsis or septic shock into 3 groups (as below) at 31 academic U.S. emergency departments

  1. EGDT : placement of central line for monitoring to ScVO2 and CVP, IVF, vasopressors, Dobutamine and PRBC’s

  2. Protocol-based: IVF until clinically euvolemic and transfusion goal of 7.5g/dl

  3. Usual Care: bedside provider judgment

The Findings:

There were no differences in mortality at 60 days, 90 days or 1 year. There were also no differences in secondary endpoints ( CV failure, Respiratory failure, Length of stay, Disposition at discharge)

The Takeaway:

Invasive protocol based treatment of sepsis including a high transfusion threshold and mandatory CVC placement for SvO2/CVP measurement do not affect mortality in severe sepsis. The most important factor is appropriate IVF resuscitation, early and appropriate antibiotics, and appropriate vasopressor administration. Please note: the “usual care” group provided aggressive and early treatment in fluids, abx, and vasopressors similar to both other groups. Usual care is not less care.

Recent Posts

See All

10th Floor Jones Hall

1316 W. Ontario Street

Philadelphia, PA 19140

T: 215.707.5435

F: 215.707.3494

E: TUHEMResidency@gmail.com