• Temple EM

Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resusc

The Article:

Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.

The Idea:

To determine whether continued mechanical chest compressions with simultaneous defibrillation improves out of hospital cardiac arrest outcomes when compared to standard of care ACLS.

The Study:

-Multicenter randomized clinical trial of 2589 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest randomized to either mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS device or traditional ACLS guidelines

-Primary endpoint = four hour survival

-Secondary end points = survival up to 6 months with good neurological outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score.

The Findings:

No significant difference was found between the two study groups with regards to the primary or secondary end points.

No significant device failures.

The Takeaway:

The LUCAS device may not be beneficial in field cardiopulmonary resuscitation if manual quality CPR is provided. LUCAS may be better suited for in house CPR under more controlled settings.


Recent Posts

See All

10th Floor Jones Hall

1316 W. Ontario Street

Philadelphia, PA 19140

T: 215.707.5435

F: 215.707.3494

E: TUHEMResidency@gmail.com